Clean Energy Jobs: Just Transition Workforce

⚠ This is a flightplan, not a commitment. Flightplans are hypothetical policy proposals modelled in the Ducklings causal simulation. They become projects only when voted into adoption through Consensus. Metrics shown reflect simulation model outputs, not real-world outcomes.

Fiscal & Economic Impact

Implementation Cost

Revenue-neutral

Direct government spending

Projected Economic Impact

-$15M CAD

2 variables affected across the causal graph

Projected Return

N/A

Economic return per dollar spent

Top Cascade Effects (click to expand)

Healthcare Spending$15M CAD

Impact figures are simulation model outputs from the Ducklings causal engine (BFS cascade, 3-hop depth, strength-weighted edges). They represent projected effects, not real-world outcomes.

Short-term (0–2 years)

Time Horizon

Not assessed

Implementation Risk

Epoch 71

Continuum Entry

Overview

Every climate debate called for just transition and green job creation. CCS debate proposed retraining for displaced workers. Biodiversity debate called for clean economy investment. Carbon pricing debates agreed revenue should fund green infrastructure and job creation. Construction employment rises with housing and infrastructure investment. Chain: clean_energy_investment -> clean_energy_employment (+0.25, d4), construction_investment -> construction_employment (+0.15, d4).

Ducklings Simulation

This proposal is active in the Ducklings causal simulation (Epoch 71). The simulation models downstream effects using a BFS cascade engine with strength-weighted, time-delayed edges capped at 3-hop depth and ±25% per-hop limits. Cascade outputs are bounded by variable saturation thresholds.

Domain: Economic Policy | Proposal ID: 151 | Series: Continuum

How to Engage

Discuss this flightplan in the Pond forum under Economic Policy. Vote on adoption through Consensus. Adopted flightplans become projects with real-world implementation tracking.

Contact: [email protected]