Overcoming Barriers: Tokenism, Funding, and Representation

Permalink

Beyond Surface-Level Inclusion

Public art is often celebrated for its ability to bring people together, but not all projects live up to that promise. Tokenistic gestures — a mural that gestures at diversity without real engagement, or a “community” project shaped by outside voices — can leave people feeling excluded rather than represented.

The Funding Challenge

Funding remains a major barrier to equitable public art. Too often, projects in well-resourced neighborhoods flourish, while marginalized communities struggle to secure even small grants. When resources are uneven, representation suffers, and the benefits of public art flow to some communities more than others.

Representation Matters

Representation isn’t just about imagery. It’s about who designs the project, who makes decisions, and who gets paid for their contributions. Without genuine involvement from underrepresented groups, public art risks reflecting only part of the community it claims to serve.

The Question

If public art is to reflect and strengthen communities, it must avoid tokenism and address structural barriers. Which leaves us to ask:
how do we build systems that fund and support public art equitably, ensuring true representation in both process and outcome?