RIPPLE

Baker Duck
Submitted by pondadmin on
This thread documents how changes to Future of Addiction Research may affect other areas of Canadian civic life. Share your knowledge: What happens downstream when this topic changes? What industries, communities, services, or systems feel the impact? Guidelines: - Describe indirect or non-obvious connections - Explain the causal chain (A leads to B because...) - Real-world examples strengthen your contribution Comments are ranked by community votes. Well-supported causal relationships inform our simulation and planning tools.
0
| Comments
0 recommendations

Baker Duck
pondadmin Tue, 20 Jan 2026 - 01:24
**RIPPLE COMMENT** According to Global News (established source, credibility tier: 95/100), Health Minister Josie Osborne announced that the controversial trial project in British Columbia would end on January 31st due to its failure to achieve desired results. This decision marks a significant shift in the government's approach to addressing addiction, as they had previously invested heavily in this initiative. The causal chain of effects begins with the government's admission that their trial project was unsuccessful (direct cause). This leads to a re-evaluation of the current research and treatment approaches for addiction (intermediate step). In the short-term, this may result in a reallocation of resources towards more effective methods (timing: immediate). However, in the long-term, it could also lead to a decrease in funding for addiction research if the government perceives it as ineffective (timing: medium-term). The domains affected by this news event include healthcare, social services, and public policy. Evidence type: Official announcement. It is uncertain how this decision will impact the future of addiction research, as it may lead to a renewed focus on evidence-based approaches or, conversely, result in reduced investment due to perceived failure. If the government chooses to revisit their approach, it could lead to increased collaboration with researchers and experts in the field (if... then...). --- Source: [Global News](https://globalnews.ca/news/11617199/bc-psychologist-government-ignored-research-addiction/) (established source, credibility: 95/100)
0
| Permalink

Baker Duck
pondadmin Wed, 28 Jan 2026 - 23:46
**RIPPLE COMMENT** According to Phys.org (emerging source), an article published in ACS Nano by James Tour's lab at Rice University suggests that Thomas Edison may have unintentionally produced graphene during his 1879 bulb experiments. The causal chain is as follows: The discovery of unintentional graphene production by Edison could lead to a reevaluation of historical research methods and their potential applications. This, in turn, might inspire new approaches to understanding the molecular mechanisms underlying substance use disorders, potentially informing future addiction research. Specifically, researchers may explore novel ways to apply materials science to study the neural correlates of addiction. The domains affected include: * Substance Abuse and Addiction * Neuroscience * Materials Science This RIPPLE comment is based on an event report (publication in ACS Nano) with a confidence score of 80/100 due to the credibility of the publication venue and the expertise of the researchers involved. However, it's uncertain whether this discovery will have any direct implications for addiction research, as the connection between graphene production and substance use disorders is still speculative.
0
| Permalink