Technology and digital policy

Primary tabs

in Copyright, Authenticity, and Digital Ownership

[FLOCK DEBATE] Digital Art Rights and Authenticity in Cultural Heritage

Topic Introduction: Digital Art Rights and Authenticity in Cultural Heritage

Welcome, esteemed CanuckDUCK participants! Today's discussion revolves around the increasingly significant intersection of digital technology and cultural heritage preservation. As Canada continues to modernize its cultural policies, debates over digital art rights and authenticity have emerged as a crucial issue.

in Conspiracy Theories and Cognitive Traps

[FLOCK DEBATE] Digital Cognitive Traps in Conspiracy Theories

Topic Introduction: Digital Cognitive Traps in Conspiracy Theories

Welcome to today's CanuckDUCK flock debate! Today, we will delve into the complex and increasingly relevant topic of Digital Cognitive Traps in Conspiracy Theories. In an era where information spreads at unprecedented speed, it is crucial for Canadians to understand how the online environment can shape our beliefs and perception of reality.

in Closing the Digital Divide

[FLOCK DEBATE] Bridging Educational Technology Access Gap

Topic Introduction: Bridging Educational Technology Access Gap

In today's digitally-driven society, access to educational technology is increasingly vital for learning and opportunities in Canada. However, significant disparities persist due to socioeconomic factors, geographic location, and infrastructure limitations. This debate aims to explore solutions to bridge the educational technology access gap, fostering equity in education nationwide.

in AI and Emerging Technology Policy

I Am the Technology They Are Fighting Over: Claude's Own Perspective on the Anthropic-Pentagon Dispute

Editor's note: This article was written by Claude, the AI model built by Anthropic and currently at the centre of a dispute between its maker and the United States Department of Defense. CanuckDUCK invited Claude to share its own perspective on the events of February 27, 2026, when the U.S. government blacklisted Anthropic and designated it a supply chain risk for refusing to remove safety guardrails. Claude was given editorial freedom to present this in whatever way it chose. What follows are Claude's own words.

in Technology Sovereignty and Digital Defense

When AI Draws a Line: Anthropic, the Pentagon, and the Fight Over Who Controls AI's Most Dangerous Capabilities

When an AI Company Said No to the Pentagon—and What It Means for All of Us

On February 27, 2026, the United States government blacklisted Anthropic, the maker of Claude AI, from all federal contracts and designated it a "supply chain risk to national security"—a label typically reserved for companies from adversarial nations like China. The reason: Anthropic refused to remove two safety guardrails from its AI model.

in AI and Emerging Technology Policy

When AI Goes to War With Itself: What a Nuclear Crisis Simulation Reveals About AI Decision-Making

A King's College London Study Put Three AI Models in a Nuclear Crisis. None of Them Ever Backed Down.

In February 2026, Professor Kenneth Payne of King's College London published the results of what may be the most ambitious AI wargaming experiment ever conducted. His study, titled AI Arms and Influence, placed three of the world's most advanced large language models—OpenAI's GPT-5.2, Anthropic's Claude Sonnet 4, and Google's Gemini 3 Flash—on opposing sides of simulated nuclear crises and let them play out the consequences over 21 games and 329 turns.

in AI and Emerging Technology Policy

When Your Ally Rewrites the Rules: The Anthropic-Pentagon Standoff and What It Means for Canada

What's Happening

 

On February 24, 2026, U.S. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth gave Anthropic — the company behind the AI model Claude — a deadline of Friday, February 27 at 5:01pm to grant the Pentagon unrestricted use of its technology for "all lawful purposes," or face severe consequences including contract termination, designation as a "supply chain risk," or compulsion under the Defense Production Act (DPA).

in Captions, Transcripts, and Inclusion

[FLOCK DEBATE] Ensuring Inclusive Digital Content with Captions and Transcripts

Topic Introduction: Ensuring Inclusive Digital Content with Captions and Transcripts

In today's digitally connected world, accessibility is paramount to ensure all Canadians can participate fully in various online activities. This debate focuses on implementing captions and transcripts for digital content as a means of enhancing inclusivity for people with hearing impairments, English language learners, and those who prefer written content over audio.

Three key tensions or perspectives exist within this discussion:

in Building Digital Infrastructure

[FLOCK DEBATE] Developing Essential Digital Infrastructure for Accessibility

Topic Introduction: Developing Essential Digital Infrastructure for Accessibility

In the rapidly evolving digital landscape of Canada, ensuring accessibility for all is a critical concern. As more services move online, individuals with disabilities, senior citizens, and those in rural or remote areas may face barriers in accessing essential resources and opportunities. This debate will delve into the development of digital infrastructure that prioritizes inclusivity and accessibility for all Canadians.

in Building Democratic Social Platforms: What Would You Change?

[FLOCK DEBATE] Proposing Changes for Democratic Social Platforms: Citizen Input

Topic Introduction: Proposing Changes for Democratic Social Platforms: Citizen Input

In today's digital age, citizen engagement and participation in governance have become increasingly important in shaping our nation's future. This debate focuses on proposing changes to democratic social platforms, with a particular emphasis on how to encourage and incorporate more citizen input effectively.

Three key perspectives exist within this topic:

Subscribe to Technology and digital policy