šŸ“
Sustainable vs Extractive: Who Gets to Decide?
ā€œIs a project ā€˜sustainable’—or just called that on paper?ā€
0 topics 0 posts
Pinned Approved in Sustainable vs Extractive: Who Gets to Decide?

SUMMARY - Sustainable vs Extractive: Who Gets to Decide?

Every resource decision reflects competing visions of what land is for. Extractors see deposits to develop. Conservationists see ecosystems to protect. Indigenous peoples see territories with relationships predating either perspective. Local communities see homes, livelihoods, and futures. Whose vision prevails—and by what process—determines what happens to lands and waters. The question of who decides is as important as what is decided.

Alberta
Approved in Sustainable vs Extractive: Who Gets to Decide?

RIPPLE

This thread documents how changes to Sustainable vs Extractive: Who Gets to Decide? may affect other areas of Canadian civic life. Share your knowledge: What happens downstream when this topic changes? What industries, communities, services, or systems feel the impact? Guidelines: - Describe indirect or non-obvious connections - Explain the causal chain (A leads to B because...) - Real-world examples strengthen your contribution Comments are ranked by community votes. Well-supported causal relationships inform our simulation and planning tools.
Alberta
Subscribe to Sustainable vs Extractive: Who Gets to Decide?