📁
What Counts as a “Natural Resource”? Rethinking Our Relationship
“Is a river just water—or a relative?”
0 topics 0 posts
Pinned Approved in What Counts as a “Natural Resource”? Rethinking Our Relationship

SUMMARY - What Counts as a “Natural Resource”? Rethinking Our Relationship

We speak of "natural resources" as if the concept were obvious—things from nature that we use. But the category is neither natural nor inevitable. It reflects a particular relationship with the more-than-human world: one where nature exists primarily for human extraction. Other relationships are possible—and questioning the resource framing may be necessary for fundamentally different ways of living with the Earth.

Alberta
Approved in What Counts as a “Natural Resource”? Rethinking Our Relationship

RIPPLE

This thread documents how changes to What Counts as a “Natural Resource”? Rethinking Our Relationship may affect other areas of Canadian civic life. Share your knowledge: What happens downstream when this topic changes? What industries, communities, services, or systems feel the impact? Guidelines: - Describe indirect or non-obvious connections - Explain the causal chain (A leads to B because...) - Real-world examples strengthen your contribution Comments are ranked by community votes. Well-supported causal relationships inform our simulation and planning tools.
Alberta
Subscribe to What Counts as a “Natural Resource”? Rethinking Our Relationship