Evaluation and Observation

Admin walkthroughs, rubrics, growth vs punishment models.

Permalink

The Double-Edged Sword of Evaluation

For teachers, evaluation and observation are often described as both a mirror and a microscope. At their best, they can be opportunities for growth, reflection, and professional development. At their worst, they can feel like surveillance that adds stress without offering meaningful feedback.

Current Practices

  • Formal Observations: Administrators sit in on lessons, assess delivery, and provide written reports.
  • Peer Observation: Teachers observe one another for collaborative feedback (when done well, this can build trust and shared learning).
  • Student Feedback: Increasingly, some schools experiment with incorporating student voice into evaluations—though this raises questions of fairness and maturity.
  • Data-Driven Metrics: Standardized test scores or student performance data are sometimes used as proxies for teaching quality.

The Big Questions

  • Should evaluations be more coaching-oriented rather than punitive?
  • How do we ensure observations reflect the full scope of a teacher’s work (not just a single class on a single day)?
  • Where is the balance between accountability and trust in professional judgment?
  • Could we reframe evaluation as a mutual process, where teachers also provide structured feedback to administrators?

The Stakes

Evaluation impacts careers, mental health, and ultimately the classroom experience for students. If done right, it strengthens the profession. If done poorly, it undermines trust and drives teachers away.