Published

Primary tabs

Approved in Governance Framework

From States to Province: How Would Governance Actually Work?

Different Systems, Fundamental Questions

Integrating the Dakotas with Saskatchewan would require more than changing flags. It would mean transitioning from one governance system to another—from American federalism to Canadian federalism, from state government to provincial government, from one set of rights and responsibilities to another.

Current Governance Structures

Saskatchewan:

Saskatchewan
Approved in Fargo-Regina Corridor

Building the Fargo-Regina Corridor: Transportation and Economic Integration

Current Connections

Today, getting from Fargo to Regina requires either:

  • A 470 km (290 mile) drive, mostly on two-lane highways through small towns
  • A flight with connections (no direct service)
  • Patience and a good podcast

The route crosses the border at Portal-North Portal, one of the quieter crossings on the Canada-US border. The infrastructure is adequate for current demand, but it wasn't built for integration.

What a True Corridor Could Look Like

Highway Infrastructure:

Saskatchewan
Approved in Oil and Potash Synergies

Resource Wealth: Combining Saskatchewan Potash with Dakota Energy

What's in the Ground

The northern Great Plains sit atop remarkable resource wealth:

Saskatchewan:

  • Potash: World's largest reserves, ~30% of global production
  • Uranium: World-class deposits in the Athabasca Basin
  • Oil: Significant production, particularly heavy oil
  • Helium: Growing production from natural gas processing

North Dakota:

Saskatchewan
Approved in Climate Solidarity

Shared Skies, Shared Challenges: Climate Change on the Northern Plains

Climate Change Doesn't Recognize Borders

The same weather systems sweep across Saskatchewan and the Dakotas. The same droughts parch the land. The same floods overwhelm the same watersheds. Climate change is already affecting the northern plains, and its impacts don't stop at the 49th parallel.

Observed Changes

Temperature:

Saskatchewan
Approved in Dakota Reunification

The Dakota Question: Why Two States, and Does It Still Make Sense?

A Brief History of Division

North Dakota and South Dakota weren't always separate. From 1861 to 1889, they were simply "Dakota Territory"—a vast expanse of prairie, badlands, and Black Hills that stretched from Minnesota to Montana.

The split, when it came, was largely political. In 1889, the Republican-controlled Congress faced a dilemma: Dakota Territory was ready for statehood, but admitting it as a single state would add only two senators (likely Republican). Splitting it would add four. The math was compelling.

Saskatchewan
Approved in Legal Framework YT

FORM QC-YT: Province of Quebec Position Statement on Yukon-Alaska Matter

Yukon
Approved in Legal Framework YT

STATEMENT: United States Department of Defense Regarding Alaska Transfer

Yukon
Approved in Legal Framework YT

UNOFFICIAL TRANSLATION: Statement from the Russian Federation Regarding Alaska

Yukon
Approved in Platform Discussions

CHARACTER REFERENCES FOR YUKON TERRITORY (Complete Set)

Yukon
Subscribe to Published